PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. BOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. BOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Box, Inc. (BOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than BOX's -16.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BIL has underperformed BOX with an annualized return of 2.20%, while BOX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return.


BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%

BOX

1D
2.55%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-16.48%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
-27.36%
3Y*
-4.56%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. BOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
BOX
Box, Inc.
-16.48%-5.35%23.39%-17.73%18.86%45.10%7.57%-0.59%-20.08%52.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and BOX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2015

-0.00

The correlation between BIL and BOX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (10 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. BOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BOX
BOX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. BOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Box, Inc. (BOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILBOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+20.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+173.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.16

0.87

+86.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

352.24

-0.72

+352.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,793.11

-1.36

+2,794.47

BIL vs. BOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.32, which is higher than the BOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and BOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIL vs. BOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum BOX drawdown of -68.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and BOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILBOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-68.56%

+67.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-38.15%

+38.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-44.57%

+44.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-44.57%

+44.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

-68.56%

+68.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.20%

+35.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-25.27%

+25.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

20.09%

-20.09%

Volatility

BIL vs. BOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.07%, while Box, Inc. (BOX) has a volatility of 13.49%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILBOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

13.49%

-13.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

29.53%

-29.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

33.83%

-33.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

33.14%

-32.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

38.78%

-38.52%

Dividends

BIL vs. BOX - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, while BOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
BOX
Box, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and BOX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOX has higher volatility (13.49%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs BOX's -68.56%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and BOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer