PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOX vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOX vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Box, Inc. (BOX) and salesforce.com, inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOX achieves a -7.52% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -24.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BOX having a 9.03% annualized return and CRM not far ahead at 9.46%.


BOX

1D
-3.92%
1M
10.60%
YTD
-7.52%
6M
-8.32%
1Y
-27.42%
3Y*
-1.61%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
9.03%

CRM

1D
-4.18%
1M
9.26%
YTD
-24.00%
6M
-14.08%
1Y
-22.66%
3Y*
-1.47%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOX vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOX
Box, Inc.
-7.52%-5.35%23.39%-17.73%18.86%45.10%7.57%-0.59%-20.08%52.38%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
-24.00%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BOX and CRM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.47

The correlation between BOX and CRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BOX:

$3.88B

CRM:

$174.93B

EPS

BOX:

$0.71

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

BOX:

38.70

CRM:

23.37

PEG Ratio

BOX:

0.38

CRM:

0.05

PS Ratio

BOX:

3.37

CRM:

4.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOX:

$1.21B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOX:

$960.21M

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

BOX:

$145.37M

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOX vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOX
BOX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOX vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Box, Inc. (BOX) and salesforce.com, inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOXCRMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.82

-0.61

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.17

-0.68

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.92

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

-0.60

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-1.18

+0.16

BOX vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOX and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOXCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

-0.61

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.07

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.27

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.46

-0.42

Drawdowns

BOX vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOX drawdown since its inception was -68.56%, roughly equal to the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOX and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.56%

-70.50%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.57%

-39.46%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.57%

-54.70%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-58.62%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.56%

-58.62%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.25%

-44.85%

+16.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-16.10%

-9.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.20%

20.10%

+6.10%

Volatility

BOX vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Box, Inc. (BOX) is 15.54%, while salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.38%. This indicates that BOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.54%

16.38%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.88%

31.57%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.53%

37.58%

-4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.02%

36.96%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.80%

35.31%

+3.49%

Dividends

BOX vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

BOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.


PositionTTM20252024
BOX
Box, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
0.84%0.63%0.48%

Financials

BOX vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Box, Inc. and salesforce.com, inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
305.94M
11.13B
(BOX) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BOX vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Box, Inc. and salesforce.com, inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%72.0%74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.5%
76.9%
Portfolio components
BOX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Box, Inc. reported a gross profit of 243.21M and revenue of 305.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

BOX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Box, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.44M and revenue of 305.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

BOX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Box, Inc. reported a net income of 11.91M and revenue of 305.94M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOX and CRM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.38%) compared to BOX (15.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOX dropped -68.56% vs CRM's -70.50%.

CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOX and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer