BIDG vs. QTJL
BIDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BIDG is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
BIDG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIDG achieves a -8.59% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.18% return.
BIDG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 20.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIDG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIDG Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | -8.59% | 16.79% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.18% | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIDG and QTJL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIDG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
BIDG
QTJL
BIDG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIDG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.52 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
BIDG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIDG drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDG and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIDG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -33.40% | -25.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.18% | 0.00% | -39.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.33% | -7.93% | -24.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
BIDG vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIDG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.62% | 9.99% | +92.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.62% | 20.42% | +82.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.62% | 20.42% | +82.20% |
BIDG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIDG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BIDG nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIDG and QTJL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.
BIDG and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BIDG and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for BIDG and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer