PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIDG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIDG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDG achieves a -8.59% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 549.02% return.


BIDG

1D
3.13%
1M
9.71%
YTD
-8.59%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-2.08%
1M
0.88%
YTD
549.02%
6M
433.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BIDG and LINT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIDG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BIDG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIDGLINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

22.52

-22.36

Drawdowns

BIDG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDG drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIDGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-49.54%

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.18%

-28.08%

-11.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.33%

-20.57%

-11.76%

Volatility

BIDG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIDGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.62%

162.52%

-59.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.62%

162.52%

-59.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.62%

162.52%

-59.90%

BIDG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIDG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

BIDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIDG and LINT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BIDG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BIDG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIDG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer