PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAWX vs. VTSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTSAX's 11.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIAWX having a 15.64% annualized return and VTSAX not far behind at 15.09%.


BIAWX

1D
2.83%
1M
9.55%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.65%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
15.64%

VTSAX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.10%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.07%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
7.17%3.18%20.20%38.88%-31.02%29.83%38.88%35.93%4.36%27.89%
VTSAX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
11.71%17.12%23.23%26.51%-19.52%25.72%20.98%30.79%-5.18%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAWX and VTSAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.90

The correlation between BIAWX and VTSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAWX vs. VTSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAWX
BIAWX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BIAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VTSAX
VTSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAWXVTSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.49

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

3.38

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.45

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

3.38

-2.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.43

15.63

-14.20

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the VTSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAWX and VTSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAWXVTSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.49

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.75

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.82

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.47

+0.32

Drawdowns

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum VTSAX drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and VTSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAWXVTSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.94%

-55.33%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.97%

-8.92%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.06%

-19.36%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.94%

-25.36%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.94%

-34.97%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-9.01%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

1.93%

+5.74%

Volatility

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX) at 2.95%. This indicates that BIAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAWXVTSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

2.95%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

9.20%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

12.21%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

17.36%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

18.41%

+3.09%

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VTSAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAWX vs. VTSAX - Dividend Comparison

BIAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.88%, more than VTSAX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
22.88%24.52%5.34%0.00%0.00%1.85%0.00%1.50%3.75%1.71%0.72%4.76%
VTSAX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.00%1.11%1.26%1.42%1.65%1.20%1.41%1.76%2.03%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAWX and VTSAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIAWX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to VTSAX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAWX dropped -36.94% vs VTSAX's -55.33%.

VTSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAWX and VTSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer