BIAWX vs. REBYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX).
BIAWX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012. REBYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000.
Performance
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund | -12.47% | 3.18% | 20.20% | 38.88% | -31.02% | 29.83% | 38.88% | 35.93% | 4.36% | 27.89% |
REBYX Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund | 2.15% | 8.86% | 8.16% | 13.81% | -16.14% | 26.28% | 13.04% | 23.74% | -12.22% | 2.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a -12.47% return, which is significantly lower than REBYX's 2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAWX has outperformed REBYX with an annualized return of 13.60%, while REBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.32% annualized return.
BIAWX
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -12.47%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
REBYX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than REBYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIAWX vs. REBYX — Risk / Return Rank
BIAWX
REBYX
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIAWX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.00 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.19 | 1.53 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.20 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 1.58 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 6.36 | -6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIAWX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.00 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.18 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.36 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.31 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIAWX and REBYX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Dividend Comparison
BIAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.02%, more than REBYX's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund | 28.02% | 24.52% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.85% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 3.75% | 1.71% | 0.72% | 4.76% |
REBYX Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund | 8.11% | 8.28% | 13.03% | 2.64% | 5.30% | 31.12% | 0.64% | 4.46% | 18.61% | 0.33% | 0.88% | 8.23% |
Drawdowns
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum REBYX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and REBYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIAWX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.94% | -62.03% | +25.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -13.85% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.94% | -32.68% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.94% | -44.79% | +7.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.27% | -6.41% | -10.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -11.24% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 3.44% | +3.54% |
Volatility
BIAWX vs. REBYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) is 6.50%, while Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that BIAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIAWX | REBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.85% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 13.12% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 22.31% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 22.79% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 23.49% | -2.06% |