PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAWX vs. PWJZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund (PWJZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than PWJZX's 11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAWX has outperformed PWJZX with an annualized return of 15.20%, while PWJZX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.


BIAWX

1D
1.20%
1M
1.72%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
15.20%

PWJZX

1D
7.04%
1M
3.79%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.87%
1Y
15.43%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
1.83%3.18%20.20%38.88%-31.02%29.83%38.88%35.93%4.36%27.89%
PWJZX
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund
11.43%14.53%6.84%20.25%-36.95%13.27%55.57%38.16%-12.93%49.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAWX and PWJZX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.78

The correlation between BIAWX and PWJZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAWX vs. PWJZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAWX
BIAWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BIAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PWJZX
PWJZX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PWJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PWJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund (PWJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIAWXPWJZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.12

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

0.73

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

2.57

-2.15

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the PWJZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAWX and PWJZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum PWJZX drawdown of -48.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and PWJZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAWXPWJZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.94%

-48.22%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.97%

-18.08%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.06%

-20.18%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.94%

-48.22%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.94%

-48.22%

+11.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-4.55%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-13.04%

+7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.70%

5.16%

+2.54%

Volatility

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) is 6.47%, while PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund (PWJZX) has a volatility of 13.70%. This indicates that BIAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAWXPWJZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

13.70%

-7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

22.46%

-8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

24.71%

-7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.69%

22.77%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

21.30%

+0.23%

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PWJZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAWX vs. PWJZX - Dividend Comparison

BIAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.08%, more than PWJZX's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
24.08%24.52%5.34%0.00%0.00%1.85%0.00%1.50%3.75%1.71%0.72%4.76%
PWJZX
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund
0.17%0.19%0.07%0.09%0.00%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.17%0.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAWX and PWJZX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWJZX has higher volatility (13.70%) compared to BIAWX (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAWX dropped -36.94% vs PWJZX's -48.22%.

PWJZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAWX and PWJZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer