BIAWX vs. BIAGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BIAWX (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund) and BIAGX (Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 10 years, BIAWX returned 15.41%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for BIAGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BIAWX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BIAGX.

Performance

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than BIAGX's 9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAWX has outperformed BIAGX with an annualized return of 15.41%, while BIAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.

BIAWX

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 7.85%
• YTD: 5.07%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 15.41%

BIAGX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 10.26%
• YTD: 9.89%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 13.75%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund	5.07%	3.18%	20.20%	38.88%	-31.02%	29.83%	38.88%	35.93%	4.36%	27.89%
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund	9.89%	0.61%	16.60%	33.90%	-33.60%	18.56%	32.41%	47.97%	4.66%	30.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAWX and BIAGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012	0.95

The correlation between BIAWX and BIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIAWX vs. BIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAWX

BIAWX Risk / Return Rank: 6
BIAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BIAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BIAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BIAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BIAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BIAGX

BIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6
BIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIAWX	BIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	0.46	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	0.73	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.09	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	0.34	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	0.82	+0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the BIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAWX and BIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIAWX	BIAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	0.46	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.11	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.37	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.29	+0.50

Drawdowns

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum BIAGX drawdown of -56.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and BIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAWX	BIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.94%	-56.68%	+19.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.97%	-20.56%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.06%	-56.68%	+31.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.94%	-56.68%	+19.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.94%	-56.68%	+19.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-42.46%	+40.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-14.99%	+9.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	8.39%	-0.72%

Volatility

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) at 3.89%. This indicates that BIAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAWX	BIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	3.89%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.27%	11.78%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.65%	14.85%	+1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.63%	47.26%	-24.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	36.34%	-14.84%

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAWX vs. BIAGX - Dividend Comparison

BIAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.34%, less than BIAGX's 78.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund	78.72%	86.50%	91.52%	6.80%	7.75%	13.04%	4.95%	9.82%	12.64%	8.09%	9.13%	6.59%
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund	23.34%	24.52%	5.34%	0.00%	0.00%	1.85%	0.00%	1.50%	3.75%	1.71%	0.72%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAWX and BIAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BIAWX and BIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BIAWX or BIAGX?

BIAWX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to BIAGX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAWX dropped -36.94% vs BIAGX's -56.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.