PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAPX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAPX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAPX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


BIAPX

1D
0.38%
1M
6.22%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.30%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.63%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAPX
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund
12.78%18.33%5.46%19.20%-16.15%14.95%19.50%24.72%-7.62%17.47%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAPX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between BIAPX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAPX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAPX
BIAPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAPXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

4.64

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

15.69

-0.63

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAPX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAPXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.06

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.24

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.43

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.33

+0.13

Drawdowns

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAPX drawdown since its inception was -53.40%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAPX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAPXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.40%

-61.24%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.52%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-30.81%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.29%

-32.01%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.13%

-39.02%

+11.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-12.93%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.51%

-0.64%

Volatility

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) is 3.70%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that BIAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAPXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.53%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

15.24%

-5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

19.23%

-8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

21.00%

-6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

20.97%

-6.93%

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAPX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAPX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

BIAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAPX
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund
5.30%5.98%0.00%4.28%2.30%6.04%2.07%2.49%6.26%3.12%1.67%13.86%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAPX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to BIAPX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAPX dropped -53.40% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

BIAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAPX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer