PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAPX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAPX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAPX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


BIAPX

1D
0.38%
1M
6.22%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.30%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.63%

ASFYX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.77%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAPX
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund
12.78%18.33%5.46%19.20%-16.15%14.95%19.50%24.72%-7.62%17.47%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAPX and ASFYX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.22

Over the past year, BIAPX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAPX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAPX
BIAPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAPXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

4.95

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

17.88

-2.82

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAPX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAPXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.20

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.22

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.23

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.35

+0.11

Drawdowns

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAPX drawdown since its inception was -53.40%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAPX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAPXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.40%

-36.43%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-5.24%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-30.32%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.29%

-36.43%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.13%

-36.43%

+9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.22%

+18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-13.18%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.45%

+0.42%

Volatility

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAPXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.67%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

9.54%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

11.77%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

13.77%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

12.71%

+1.33%

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAPX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAPX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

BIAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
BIAPX
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund
5.30%5.98%0.00%4.28%2.30%6.04%2.07%2.49%6.26%3.12%1.67%13.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAPX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIAPX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to ASFYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAPX dropped -53.40% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

BIAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAPX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer