PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAHX vs. 2328.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) and PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BIAHX is traded in USD, while 2328.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2328.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAHX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than 2328.HK's -9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAHX has underperformed 2328.HK with an annualized return of 11.95%, while 2328.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.


BIAHX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
2.45%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
11.95%

2328.HK

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
-9.95%
6M
-13.18%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
-0.34%47.26%10.85%19.36%-11.95%14.54%11.34%29.43%-16.60%32.37%
2328.HK
PICC Property & Casualty-H
-9.95%38.38%43.13%32.75%23.23%15.06%-32.55%22.32%23.60%28.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAHX and 2328.HK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.19

The correlation between BIAHX and 2328.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

2328.HK
2328.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
2328.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2328.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
2328.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
2328.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
2328.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) and PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAHX2328.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.04

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

0.10

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

0.19

+1.96

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the 2328.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAHX and 2328.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAHX2328.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.10

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.45

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.36

+0.22

Drawdowns

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAHX drawdown since its inception was -34.90%, smaller than the maximum 2328.HK drawdown of -89.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAHX and 2328.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAHX2328.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.90%

-89.31%

+54.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-28.08%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-28.08%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.95%

-28.08%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

-44.09%

+9.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-23.64%

+15.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-25.21%

+19.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

14.37%

-10.03%

Volatility

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) is 4.04%, while PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that BIAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2328.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAHX2328.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

7.08%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

20.11%

-8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

27.98%

-13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

30.27%

-13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

33.69%

-16.39%

Dividends

BIAHX vs. 2328.HK - Dividend Comparison

BIAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than 2328.HK's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2328.HK
PICC Property & Casualty-H
4.23%3.83%6.22%5.65%6.41%7.13%8.59%3.29%3.43%3.54%4.46%3.33%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.63%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAHX and 2328.HK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAHX and 2328.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer