2328.HK vs. 0939.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2328.HK or 0939.HK.
Key characteristics
| 2328.HK | 0939.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.91% | 12.69% |
| 1Y Return | -4.16% | 1.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 14.30% | 1.92% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.82% | 2.93% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.34% | 6.57% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 0.45 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.51% | 20.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.34% | -69.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.34% | -14.58% |
Fundamentals
| 2328.HK | 0939.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$210.19B | HK$1.32T |
| EPS | HK$0.00 | HK$1.34 |
| PE Ratio | 7.94 | 3.65 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.62 | 0.79 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$474.12B | HK$620.10B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$37.09B | HK$667.93B |
Correlation
The correlation between 2328.HK and 0939.HK is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
2328.HK vs. 0939.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 2328.HK achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than 0939.HK's 12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, 2328.HK has outperformed 0939.HK with an annualized return of 8.34%, while 0939.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 6.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2328.HK vs. 0939.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2328.HK vs. 0939.HK - Dividend Comparison
2328.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, less than 0939.HK's 8.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2328.HK PICC Property & Casualty-H | 5.49% | 5.65% | 6.41% | 7.13% | 8.59% | 3.29% | 5.14% | 2.36% | 2.97% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 2.66% |
0939.HK China Construction Bank Corp | 8.05% | 9.08% | 8.71% | 7.24% | 5.94% | 5.19% | 5.34% | 4.44% | 5.41% | 7.18% | 5.93% | 5.76% |
Drawdowns
2328.HK vs. 0939.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2328.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.34%, which is greater than 0939.HK's maximum drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2328.HK and 0939.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2328.HK vs. 0939.HK - Volatility Comparison
PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) at 4.07%. This indicates that 2328.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0939.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
2328.HK vs. 0939.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PICC Property & Casualty-H and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities