PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2328.HK vs. AEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2328.HK is traded in HKD, while AEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AEP.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2328.HK achieves a -12.78% return, which is significantly lower than AEP.L's 15.64% return. Over the past 10 years, 2328.HK has underperformed AEP.L with an annualized return of 9.56%, while AEP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.10% annualized return.


2328.HK

1D
1.06%
1M
2.15%
YTD
-12.78%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
-0.25%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
21.02%
10Y*
9.56%

AEP.L

1D
-3.78%
1M
-17.68%
YTD
15.64%
6M
16.79%
1Y
108.58%
3Y*
32.15%
5Y*
21.52%
10Y*
14.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2328.HK
PICC Property & Casualty-H
-12.78%39.07%41.94%32.72%23.44%15.91%-32.99%21.68%-16.08%27.70%
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
15.64%141.40%-2.80%-8.25%-0.13%23.18%4.29%5.04%-29.88%26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between 2328.HK and AEP.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.11

The correlation between 2328.HK and AEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2328.HK vs. AEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2328.HK
2328.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
2328.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2328.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
2328.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
2328.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
2328.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP.L
AEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2328.HKAEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.45

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

3.49

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.02

18.05

-18.07

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2328.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the AEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2328.HK and AEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2328.HKAEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

2.39

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.63

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.40

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.16

+0.17

Drawdowns

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2328.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than AEP.L's maximum drawdown of -77.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2328.HK and AEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2328.HKAEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-77.04%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.54%

-30.97%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-30.97%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.54%

-35.90%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.63%

-64.82%

+18.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-30.97%

+4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-30.99%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.84%

5.99%

+7.85%

Volatility

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) is 8.66%, while Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a volatility of 30.62%. This indicates that 2328.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2328.HKAEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

30.62%

-21.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

37.73%

-17.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.35%

45.22%

-16.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

34.83%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

36.03%

-5.85%

Dividends

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Dividend Comparison

2328.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than AEP.L's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2328.HK
PICC Property & Casualty-H
4.39%3.83%6.24%5.65%6.41%7.13%8.60%3.29%7.71%2.36%2.97%2.22%
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
4.17%4.80%1.81%4.78%0.51%0.10%0.07%0.40%0.53%0.39%0.26%0.56%

Financials

2328.HK vs. AEP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PICC Property & Casualty-H and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 2328.HK values in HKD, AEP.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


2328.HK and AEP.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2328.HK and AEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer