2328.HK vs. 6060.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd (6060.HK).
Performance
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2328.HK achieves a -11.31% return, which is significantly higher than 6060.HK's -20.63% return.
2328.HK
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- -11.31%
- 6M
- -17.18%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
6060.HK
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- -20.63%
- 6M
- -29.56%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- -20.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.64%
- 10Y*
- —
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2328.HK PICC Property & Casualty-H | -11.31% | 39.07% | 41.94% | 32.72% | 23.44% | 15.91% | -32.99% | 21.68% | -16.08% | 8.84% |
6060.HK ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd | -20.63% | 37.05% | -34.19% | -17.02% | -20.66% | -25.14% | 28.83% | 12.18% | -63.85% | 6.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2328.HK and 6060.HK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK — Risk / Return Rank
2328.HK
6060.HK
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd (6060.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2328.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.07 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 0.61 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.08 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.01 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | 0.03 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2328.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.07 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | -0.41 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -0.30 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2328.HK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than 6060.HK's maximum drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2328.HK and 6060.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2328.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -89.95% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -41.78% | +15.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -81.10% | +55.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -86.36% | -13.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -69.22% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 21.85% | -11.66% |
Volatility
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) is 9.38%, while ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd (6060.HK) has a volatility of 10.72%. This indicates that 2328.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6060.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2328.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 10.72% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 23.36% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.31% | 60.44% | -29.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.38% | 58.84% | -28.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.16% | 59.27% | -29.11% |
Dividends
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Dividend Comparison
2328.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, while 6060.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2328.HK PICC Property & Casualty-H | 4.32% | 3.83% | 6.24% | 5.65% | 6.41% | 7.13% | 8.60% | 3.29% | 7.71% | 2.36% | 2.97% | 2.22% |
6060.HK ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
2328.HK vs. 6060.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PICC Property & Casualty-H and ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities