BHDG vs. NGHT
BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) and NGHT (Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Nicholas. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.
Performance
BHDG vs. NGHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BHDG
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NGHT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BHDG vs. NGHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | -7.36% |
NGHT Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF | -17.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHDG and NGHT is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | -0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHDG vs. NGHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BHDG vs. NGHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum NGHT drawdown of -23.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and NGHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHDG | NGHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -23.03% | +7.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -21.11% | +10.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -10.47% | +2.09% |
Volatility
BHDG vs. NGHT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHDG | NGHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.91% | 30.89% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 30.89% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 30.89% | -3.98% |
BHDG vs. NGHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BHDG and NGHT have an expense ratio of 0.97%.
Dividends
BHDG vs. NGHT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BHDG nor NGHT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BHDG and NGHT have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BHDG and NGHT have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.
BHDG and NGHT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for BHDG and NGHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer