PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGHT vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NGHT vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NGHT

1D
-1.38%
1M
1.96%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.38%
6M
-8.81%
YTD
-7.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGHT vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NGHT and BFOC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGHT vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NGHT vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NGHT vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGHT drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGHT and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGHTBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-18.41%

-3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.99%

-17.91%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-13.09%

+3.87%

Volatility

NGHT vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGHTBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.93%

12.06%

+17.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.93%

12.06%

+17.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

12.06%

+17.87%

NGHT vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGHT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NGHT vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither NGHT nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NGHT and BFOC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for NGHT.

NGHT and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NGHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for NGHT and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGHT and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer