BHCHX vs. PDFDX
BHCHX (Baron Health Care Fund) and PDFDX (Perkins Discovery Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BHCHX returned 0.06%/yr vs -4.76%/yr for PDFDX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BHCHX charges 0.85%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for PDFDX.
Performance
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHCHX achieves a -7.63% return, which is significantly lower than PDFDX's 1.98% return.
BHCHX
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -7.63%
- 6M
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- 11.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PDFDX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- -4.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHCHX Baron Health Care Fund | -7.63% | 10.28% | 1.55% | 6.42% | -16.90% | 15.71% | 47.71% | 18.75% |
PDFDX Perkins Discovery Fund | 1.98% | 9.94% | 19.19% | 10.77% | -39.93% | 2.11% | 62.16% | -6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHCHX and PDFDX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between BHCHX and PDFDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHCHX vs. PDFDX — Risk / Return Rank
BHCHX
PDFDX
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX) and Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BHCHX | PDFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.52 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 4.28 | -2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BHCHX | PDFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.29 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | -0.16 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHCHX drawdown since its inception was -28.53%, smaller than the maximum PDFDX drawdown of -67.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHCHX and PDFDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHCHX | PDFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.53% | -67.44% | +38.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.24% | -22.11% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -31.75% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.53% | -59.95% | +31.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.51% | -34.65% | +22.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -25.72% | +14.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 7.80% | -1.69% |
Volatility
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX) is 5.72%, while Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that BHCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHCHX | PDFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 6.50% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 18.09% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.23% | 26.02% | -10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 29.80% | -12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 28.96% | -9.22% |
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BHCHX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PDFDX's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BHCHX vs. PDFDX - Dividend Comparison
BHCHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHCHX Baron Health Care Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDFDX Perkins Discovery Fund | 9.60% | 4.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 31.11% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BHCHX and PDFDX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDFDX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to BHCHX (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHCHX dropped -28.53% vs PDFDX's -67.44%.
PDFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHCHX and PDFDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer