PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHCHX vs. GGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BHCHX having a -7.63% return and GGHCX slightly higher at -7.49%.


BHCHX

1D
-2.24%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-7.63%
6M
-9.29%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
2.13%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*

GGHCX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-7.49%
6M
-9.37%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
6.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BHCHX
Baron Health Care Fund
-7.63%10.28%1.55%6.42%-16.90%15.71%47.71%18.75%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
-7.49%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%22.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BHCHX and GGHCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2019

0.92

The correlation between BHCHX and GGHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHCHX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHCHX
BHCHX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BHCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BHCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BHCHXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

0.46

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

0.74

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.08

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.44

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.92

1.02

+0.90

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHCHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the GGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHCHX and GGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHCHXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.46

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.15

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.57

-0.10

Drawdowns

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHCHX drawdown since its inception was -28.53%, smaller than the maximum GGHCX drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHCHX and GGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHCHXGGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.53%

-40.23%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-13.53%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-16.86%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.53%

-25.37%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.51%

-11.85%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-8.82%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

5.80%

+0.31%

Volatility

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) at 4.40%. This indicates that BHCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHCHXGGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

4.40%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

10.12%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

13.09%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

15.53%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

17.45%

+2.29%

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHCHX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BHCHX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison

BHCHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHCHX
Baron Health Care Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.00%0.00%1.41%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
6.15%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BHCHX and GGHCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BHCHX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to GGHCX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHCHX dropped -28.53% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.

BHCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHCHX and GGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer