BGX vs. QLEIX
BGX (Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund) and QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BGX returned 6.02%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for QLEIX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QLEIX.
Performance
BGX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGX achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than QLEIX's -2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BGX has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 6.02%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.
BGX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- -7.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
QLEIX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 14.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
BGX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | -4.68% | 2.09% | 19.83% | 18.92% | -20.57% | 17.54% | -5.67% | 24.98% | -4.19% | 7.28% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -2.03% | 34.43% | 30.50% | 23.95% | 19.18% | 31.10% | -13.92% | 1.19% | -16.33% | 15.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGX and QLEIX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGX
QLEIX
BGX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.34 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.35 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 6.77 | -7.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGX drawdown since its inception was -47.40%, which is greater than QLEIX's maximum drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGX and QLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.40% | -38.11% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -6.01% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.08% | -7.07% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.94% | -17.07% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.40% | -38.11% | -9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.33% | -2.63% | -5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -7.68% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 2.08% | +4.37% |
Volatility
BGX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is 1.30%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that BGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 2.91% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.74% | 6.25% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 7.66% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 10.02% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 10.56% | +6.94% |
BGX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison
BGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than QLEIX's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | 9.12% | 8.87% | 9.89% | 11.71% | 8.15% | 7.01% | 8.76% | 9.35% | 11.74% | 7.12% | 9.01% | 8.72% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.79% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLEIX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to BGX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGX dropped -47.40% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.
QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGX and QLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer