PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGX vs. PWLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGX vs. PWLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGX achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly lower than PWLIX's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BGX has outperformed PWLIX with an annualized return of 6.31%, while PWLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.


BGX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
-4.34%
6M
-3.89%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
6.31%

PWLIX

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
-0.18%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
4.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGX vs. PWLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
-4.34%2.09%19.83%18.92%-20.57%17.54%-5.67%24.98%-4.19%7.28%
PWLIX
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund
-0.41%4.64%4.65%4.04%4.33%15.15%-12.66%9.60%0.49%11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BGX and PWLIX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.15

The correlation between BGX and PWLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGX vs. PWLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGX
BGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PWLIX
PWLIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
PWLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PWLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGX vs. PWLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGXPWLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.00

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

-0.02

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

-0.06

-0.39

BGX vs. PWLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the PWLIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGX and PWLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGXPWLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

-0.02

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.49

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.51

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.43

-0.15

Drawdowns

BGX vs. PWLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGX drawdown since its inception was -47.40%, which is greater than PWLIX's maximum drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGX and PWLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGXPWLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.40%

-26.92%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-9.43%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.08%

-11.74%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-11.74%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.40%

-26.92%

-20.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.00%

-9.06%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-4.18%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.88%

3.22%

+2.66%

Volatility

BGX vs. PWLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is 1.41%, while PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that BGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGXPWLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

2.58%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.95%

6.55%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.98%

8.43%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

8.96%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

9.00%

+8.54%

BGX vs. PWLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PWLIX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGX vs. PWLIX - Dividend Comparison

BGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, more than PWLIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
9.04%8.87%9.89%11.71%8.15%7.01%8.76%9.35%11.74%7.12%9.01%8.72%
PWLIX
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund
6.67%6.65%4.75%5.51%14.75%11.99%7.31%6.79%0.39%10.82%4.16%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGX and PWLIX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWLIX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to BGX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGX dropped -47.40% vs PWLIX's -26.92%.

PWLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGX and PWLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer