PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGX vs. LONGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGX vs. LONGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGX achieves a -3.70% return, which is significantly lower than LONGX's 13.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BGX has underperformed LONGX with an annualized return of 6.63%, while LONGX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.99% annualized return.


BGX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-3.70%
6M
-3.10%
1Y
-3.44%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
6.63%

LONGX

1D
0.36%
1M
2.79%
YTD
13.22%
6M
11.21%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
24.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGX vs. LONGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
-3.70%2.09%19.83%18.92%-20.57%17.54%-5.67%24.98%-4.19%7.28%
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
13.22%1.49%14.95%5.64%-13.21%13.89%27.70%13.82%270.32%19.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BGX and LONGX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2015

0.26

The correlation between BGX and LONGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGX vs. LONGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGX
BGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LONGX
LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGX vs. LONGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGXLONGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.28

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.40

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

9.24

-9.79

BGX vs. LONGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the LONGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGX and LONGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGX vs. LONGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGX drawdown since its inception was -47.40%, smaller than the maximum LONGX drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGX and LONGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGXLONGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.40%

-77.16%

+29.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-7.09%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.08%

-14.57%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-19.28%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.40%

-77.16%

+29.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.39%

0.00%

-7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-7.33%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

1.84%

+4.35%

Volatility

BGX vs. LONGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is 0.98%, while Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that BGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGXLONGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

3.21%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

8.51%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

10.89%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

11.90%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

137.76%

-120.24%

BGX vs. LONGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than LONGX's 1.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGX vs. LONGX - Dividend Comparison

BGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%, while LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
9.03%8.87%9.89%11.71%8.15%7.01%8.76%9.35%11.74%7.12%9.01%8.72%
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.40%7.64%1.73%0.00%0.00%3.10%268.50%23.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGX and LONGX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LONGX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to BGX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGX dropped -47.40% vs LONGX's -77.16%.

LONGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGX and LONGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer