BGVIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
BGVIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 5, 2008. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | -2.73% | 33.72% | 12.53% | 21.71% | -5.97% | 21.20% | 1.97% | 17.38% | -10.39% | 16.23% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGVIX achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BGVIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
BGVIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -2.73%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGVIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGVIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
BGVIX
CSUAX
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.63 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.17 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.36 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 10.32 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.63 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.61 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.50 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGVIX and CSUAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
BGVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | 12.75% | 12.41% | 9.13% | 4.80% | 3.31% | 6.00% | 2.98% | 2.46% | 6.99% | 4.02% | 2.07% | 8.51% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGVIX drawdown since its inception was -41.16%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGVIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.16% | -52.20% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -7.98% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -20.45% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | -35.05% | -6.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.73% | -4.38% | -4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -8.49% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.83% | +0.86% |
Volatility
BGVIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that BGVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 3.26% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 6.89% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 11.48% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 12.89% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 14.89% | +2.55% |