PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGT vs. BGSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGT vs. BGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than BGSAX's 35.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has underperformed BGSAX with an annualized return of 6.36%, while BGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.57% annualized return.


BGT

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.43%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
6.36%

BGSAX

1D
-5.96%
1M
2.68%
YTD
35.11%
6M
33.45%
1Y
52.07%
3Y*
37.13%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
25.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGT vs. BGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
-0.21%-0.84%16.12%26.29%-16.57%25.89%-0.81%18.97%-11.95%3.91%
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
35.11%19.63%40.56%49.09%-43.13%8.19%86.27%43.84%2.03%49.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BGT and BGSAX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2004

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGT vs. BGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGT
BGT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BGSAX
BGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGT vs. BGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGTBGSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.34

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

3.01

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.46

8.77

-9.23

BGT vs. BGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGT Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the BGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGT and BGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGT vs. BGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum BGSAX drawdown of -73.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and BGSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGTBGSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-73.75%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-18.49%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-27.75%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.19%

-49.22%

+26.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.90%

-49.22%

+7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-6.17%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-26.32%

+18.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

6.33%

-1.16%

Volatility

BGT vs. BGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 1.42%, while BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGTBGSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

15.70%

-14.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

24.45%

-17.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

28.53%

-18.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

28.46%

-14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

26.23%

-10.89%

BGT vs. BGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BGSAX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGT vs. BGSAX - Dividend Comparison

BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.63%, more than BGSAX's 10.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
10.03%13.55%8.68%0.00%0.00%7.66%4.86%1.50%1.24%8.01%1.17%0.00%
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
13.63%12.74%11.22%10.36%6.87%5.55%7.58%6.33%6.64%5.03%5.03%6.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGT and BGSAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGSAX has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to BGT (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs BGSAX's -73.75%.

BGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGT and BGSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer