BGT vs. BDJ
BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) and BDJ (BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund) are both mutual funds - BGT is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while BDJ is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, BGT returned 6.36%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for BDJ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGT charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for BDJ.
Performance
BGT vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than BDJ's 2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has underperformed BDJ with an annualized return of 6.36%, while BDJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- -2.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
BDJ
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
BGT vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | -0.21% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | 2.35% | 26.12% | 16.87% | -6.67% | 0.83% | 26.56% | -7.58% | 37.43% | -10.42% | 20.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and BDJ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2005 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
BDJ
BGT vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGT | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.47 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 5.37 | -5.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGT vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and BDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -59.46% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -12.28% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -15.70% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -21.39% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -48.14% | +6.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -1.27% | -5.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -8.94% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 3.37% | +1.80% |
Volatility
BGT vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 1.42%, while BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 3.46% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 9.47% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 12.18% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 16.11% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 18.41% | -3.07% |
BGT vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGT vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.63%, more than BDJ's 9.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | 9.18% | 9.03% | 8.21% | 9.49% | 12.18% | 5.95% | 7.08% | 6.66% | 7.21% | 6.07% | 6.88% | 7.36% |
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.63% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGT and BDJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDJ has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to BGT (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs BDJ's -59.46%.
BDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGT and BDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer