PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGSIX vs. STK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGSIX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional (BGSIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGSIX achieves a 44.14% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 59.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BGSIX has outperformed STK with an annualized return of 26.12%, while STK has yielded a comparatively lower 24.60% annualized return.


BGSIX

1D
1.14%
1M
21.29%
YTD
44.14%
6M
42.37%
1Y
69.04%
3Y*
40.81%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
26.12%

STK

1D
-0.19%
1M
17.70%
YTD
59.80%
6M
57.03%
1Y
116.50%
3Y*
37.51%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
24.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGSIX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGSIX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional
44.14%19.92%40.31%49.49%-42.99%8.45%86.73%44.23%2.24%49.89%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
59.80%24.85%17.74%46.60%-30.36%48.63%25.39%52.73%-14.91%33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BGSIX and STK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009

0.68

The correlation between BGSIX and STK shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGSIX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGSIX
BGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

STK
STK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGSIX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional (BGSIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGSIXSTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.80

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

9.12

-5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

38.55

-27.00

BGSIX vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is lower than the STK Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGSIX and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGSIXSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

5.11

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.88

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.94

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.76

-0.29

Drawdowns

BGSIX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGSIX drawdown since its inception was -73.48%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGSIX and STK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGSIXSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.48%

-41.74%

-31.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.42%

-12.84%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-26.59%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.11%

-36.27%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.11%

-41.74%

-7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-7.41%

-18.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

3.03%

+3.09%

Volatility

BGSIX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional (BGSIX) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) at 8.47%. This indicates that BGSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGSIXSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

8.47%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.29%

18.91%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.76%

22.93%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.76%

25.10%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

26.13%

-0.25%

BGSIX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGSIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGSIX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

BGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than STK's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGSIX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional
8.43%12.16%7.82%0.00%0.00%7.12%4.47%1.39%1.15%7.72%1.10%0.00%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
4.72%7.38%16.02%6.70%12.62%8.48%6.79%7.86%14.88%11.82%9.87%10.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGSIX and STK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGSIX has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to STK (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGSIX dropped -73.48% vs STK's -41.74%.

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGSIX and STK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer