BGSAX vs. STK
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK).
BGSAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 15, 2000. STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009.
Performance
BGSAX vs. STK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGSAX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGSAX BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A | -6.28% | 19.63% | 40.56% | 49.09% | -43.13% | 8.19% | 86.27% | 43.84% | 2.03% | 49.45% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.23% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGSAX achieves a -6.28% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BGSAX has outperformed STK with an annualized return of 20.75%, while STK has yielded a comparatively lower 19.36% annualized return.
BGSAX
- 1D
- 4.78%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- -6.28%
- 6M
- -7.98%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 20.75%
STK
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 50.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 19.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGSAX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGSAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGSAX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank
BGSAX
STK
BGSAX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGSAX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.97 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.70 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.73 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 13.76 | -9.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGSAX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.97 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.61 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.75 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGSAX and STK is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGSAX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison
BGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.46%, more than STK's 6.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGSAX BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A | 14.46% | 13.55% | 8.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.66% | 4.86% | 1.50% | 1.24% | 8.01% | 1.17% | 0.00% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 6.96% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
Drawdowns
BGSAX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGSAX drawdown since its inception was -73.75%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGSAX and STK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGSAX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.75% | -41.74% | -32.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.49% | -13.59% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.22% | -36.27% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.22% | -41.74% | -7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -4.93% | -9.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.53% | -7.47% | -19.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 3.69% | +2.43% |
Volatility
BGSAX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) at 10.03%. This indicates that BGSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGSAX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.93% | 10.03% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | 18.08% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.44% | 25.75% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 24.85% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 25.92% | -0.32% |