BGS vs. CHD
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — BGS in Packaged Foods, CHD in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -14.86%/yr vs 8.34%/yr for CHD. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -2.65% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 17.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed CHD with an annualized return of -14.86%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
CHD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
BGS vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 17.09% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | 8.36% | 33.23% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and CHD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.28 |
The correlation between BGS and CHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BGS:
$323.22M
CHD:
$23.23B
BGS:
-$0.96
CHD:
$3.02
BGS:
0.18
CHD:
3.82
BGS:
0.80
CHD:
5.55
BGS:
$1.81B
CHD:
$6.21B
BGS:
$388.44M
CHD:
$2.80B
BGS:
$91.70M
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
CHD
BGS vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.01 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -0.03 | +0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -51.52% | -34.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -17.18% | -15.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.36% | -27.28% | -40.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -31.72% | -52.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -31.72% | -54.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.99% | -12.41% | -71.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -12.01% | -20.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.32% | 9.41% | +1.91% |
Volatility
BGS vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 7.00%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 7.00% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 15.90% | +17.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.42% | 21.99% | +29.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.32% | 20.65% | +28.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 21.85% | +24.46% |
Dividends
BGS vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.86%, more than CHD's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
Financials
BGS vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
CHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
CHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
CHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and CHD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGS has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to CHD (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs CHD's -51.52%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer