BGRN vs. HCRB
BGRN (iShares USD Green Bond ETF) and HCRB (Hartford Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGRN is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI USD Green Bond Select Index, while HCRB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Hartford. BGRN is passively managed, while HCRB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGRN returned 0.54%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for HCRB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGRN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HCRB.
Performance
BGRN vs. HCRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRN achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than HCRB's 0.18% return.
BGRN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
HCRB
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- —
BGRN vs. HCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRN iShares USD Green Bond ETF | 0.43% | 7.27% | 2.77% | 6.50% | -13.06% | -2.80% | 3.92% |
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF | 0.18% | 7.06% | 2.23% | 6.98% | -14.61% | -1.79% | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRN and HCRB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BGRN and HCRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGRN vs. HCRB — Risk / Return Rank
BGRN
HCRB
BGRN vs. HCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGRN | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.88 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 5.68 | +2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGRN | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.39 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.02 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.13 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
BGRN vs. HCRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, roughly equal to the maximum HCRB drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRN and HCRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRN | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -19.90% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -2.82% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.55% | -6.18% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.73% | -19.42% | +0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.86% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -7.02% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.93% | -0.27% |
Volatility
BGRN vs. HCRB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) is 1.06%, while Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that BGRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGRN | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.30% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 2.70% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97% | 3.81% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 6.13% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 5.96% | -0.96% |
BGRN vs. HCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HCRB's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGRN vs. HCRB - Dividend Comparison
BGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than HCRB's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRN iShares USD Green Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.21% | 4.07% | 3.52% | 2.66% | 0.78% | 1.82% | 3.66% | 0.21% |
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF | 4.19% | 4.12% | 4.15% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 1.47% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BGRN and HCRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HCRB has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to BGRN (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRN dropped -19.16% vs HCRB's -19.90%.
On 5-year performance, BGRN leads with 0.54% vs 0.12% for HCRB. On fees, BGRN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BGRN has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BGRN has performed better with a 0.54% return vs 0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BGRN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HCRB.
BGRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 4.19% for HCRB.
BGRN is categorized as Global Bonds, while HCRB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BGRN and 0.29% for HCRB.
BGRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGRN and HCRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer