PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGRN vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGRN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGRN vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BGRN
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
-0.27%7.27%2.77%6.50%-13.06%-2.80%6.86%9.70%1.14%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-4.63%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGRN achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -4.63% return.


BGRN

1D
0.51%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.73%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-4.63%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGRN vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGRN
BGRN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGRN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGRN^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

0.90

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.39

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.40

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.69

6.61

+1.08

BGRN vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGRN Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGRN and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGRN^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.90

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.61

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between BGRN and ^GSPC is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

BGRN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGRN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRN and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGRN^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-56.78%

+37.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-12.14%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.73%

-25.43%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-6.45%

+4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-10.75%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

2.57%

-1.93%

Volatility

BGRN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) is 1.45%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that BGRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGRN^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

5.34%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

9.54%

-7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55%

18.33%

-14.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

16.91%

-11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

18.05%

-13.02%