BGRFX vs. FMDGX
BGRFX (Baron Growth Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGRFX returned -4.63%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for FMDGX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BGRFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRFX achieves a -6.97% return, which is significantly lower than FMDGX's 2.42% return.
BGRFX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -6.97%
- 1Y
- -15.70%
- 3Y*
- -4.81%
- 5Y*
- -4.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
FMDGX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- -1.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | -6.97% | -14.51% | 4.62% | 14.68% | -22.55% | 19.82% | 32.77% | 5.45% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 2.42% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRFX and FMDGX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGRFX and FMDGX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGRFX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGRFX
FMDGX
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGRFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.02 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.07 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 0.19 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRFX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -38.59% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.86% | -14.75% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.03% | -25.30% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.02% | -38.59% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.28% | -4.49% | -22.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -11.02% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 5.31% | +9.46% |
Volatility
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.45%. This indicates that BGRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGRFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 5.45% | +4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.44% | 14.03% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 17.67% | +5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 22.55% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 24.22% | -2.75% |
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGRFX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
BGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.48%, more than FMDGX's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | 22.48% | 20.91% | 12.05% | 1.79% | 6.02% | 7.73% | 4.64% | 3.68% | 8.38% | 11.68% | 12.84% | 9.53% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.81% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGRFX and FMDGX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGRFX has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to FMDGX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRFX dropped -56.10% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGRFX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer