PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLYX vs. GLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLYX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than GLEIX's 23.46% return.


BGLYX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.39%

GLEIX

1D
1.58%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
23.46%
6M
23.38%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
32.59%
5Y*
23.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.61%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%16.13%-3.25%25.44%-8.06%1.33%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
23.46%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-15.17%6.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLYX and GLEIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.63

The correlation between BGLYX and GLEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGLYX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGLYXGLEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.65

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

9.31

-2.10

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the GLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLYX and GLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGLYXGLEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.82

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.15

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.13

Drawdowns

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLYX drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, smaller than the maximum GLEIX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLYX and GLEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLYXGLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.54%

-59.27%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-7.29%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-17.07%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-21.89%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-4.80%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-8.54%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.85%

-0.93%

Volatility

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) is 3.58%, while Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that BGLYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGLYXGLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

6.09%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

11.34%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

14.65%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

20.66%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

25.47%

-9.83%

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGLYX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison

BGLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.53%, more than GLEIX's 8.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.53%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.10%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGLYX and GLEIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLEIX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to BGLYX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLYX dropped -36.54% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.

GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGLYX and GLEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer