BGLD vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGLD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. BGLD is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, BGLD returned 7.94% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BGLD charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

BGLD vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.

BGLD

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: -3.71%
• 6M: -6.89%
• 1Y: 7.94%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLD vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	-3.71%	20.82%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and RBIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

BGLD vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD

BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 18
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLD vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGLD	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	4.35	-3.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	6.69	-5.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	2.13	-1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	7.82	-7.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	42.95	-41.00

BGLD vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLD and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGLD	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-0.52%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-0.52%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.95%	-0.50%	-10.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-0.07%	-3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	0.10%	+3.97%

Volatility

BGLD vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that BGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGLD	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	0.36%	+4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.79%	0.85%	+9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	0.95%	+11.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.13%	1.07%	+9.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.02%	1.07%	+8.95%

BGLD vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGLD vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.03%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	46.03%	44.32%	25.04%	10.49%	0.40%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGLD and RBIL in my portfolio?

BGLD and RBIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGLD or RBIL?

BGLD has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLD dropped -16.19% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, BGLD or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, BGLD leads with 7.94% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BGLD or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, BGLD has performed better with a 7.94% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGLD or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGLD or RBIL?

BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 46.03%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between BGLD and RBIL?

BGLD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for BGLD and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.