BGLD vs. NVDO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGLD charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

BGLD vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.

BGLD

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 12.93%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 29.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLD vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	0.32%	12.03%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	18.85%	11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and NVDO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

BGLD vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD

BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 28
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLD vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGLD	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGLD	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.30	-0.25

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGLD	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-16.25%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.22%	-2.68%	-4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-4.99%	+1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BGLD	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	31.93%	-20.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.97%	31.93%	-21.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.89%	31.93%	-22.04%

BGLD vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGLD vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.18%, more than NVDO's 14.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	44.18%	44.32%	25.04%	10.49%	0.40%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.02%	16.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGLD and NVDO in my portfolio?

BGLD and NVDO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BGLD or NVDO?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGLD or NVDO?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGLD or NVDO?

BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 44.18%, compared with 14.02% for NVDO.

What is the main difference between BGLD and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for BGLD and 0.77% for NVDO.