BGH vs. UTF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BGH (Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Barings, while UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BGH returned 7.57%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for UTF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BGH vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGH achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 17.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BGH has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 7.57%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.

BGH

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -4.14%
• 1Y: 1.91%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

UTF

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 17.41%
• 6M: 16.78%
• 1Y: 12.45%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGH vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGH Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund	-2.67%	8.56%	27.22%	18.18%	-19.89%	24.10%	-4.54%	21.53%	-8.65%	10.49%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	17.41%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	42.74%	-9.87%	34.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BGH and UTF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012	0.34

The correlation between BGH and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BGH vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGH

BGH Risk / Return Rank: 4
BGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BGH Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 67
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGH vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGH	UTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.01	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	1.47	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.18	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	1.21	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.23	2.47	-2.24

BGH vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGH and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGH vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGH drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGH and UTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGH	UTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.73%	-72.62%	+23.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.90%	-10.33%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	-21.06%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.62%	-30.28%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.73%	-52.53%	+3.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.25%	-0.40%	-9.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-10.35%	+3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.31%	5.05%	+3.26%

Volatility

BGH vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) is 2.26%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that BGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGH	UTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	2.46%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.94%	8.35%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	12.36%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	18.28%	-5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.95%	23.35%	-7.40%

Dividends

BGH vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

BGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.31%, more than UTF's 6.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGH Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund	12.31%	11.38%	9.72%	10.66%	9.99%	7.31%	9.10%	10.14%	12.11%	9.50%	9.61%	13.31%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.90%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGH and UTF in my portfolio?

BGH and UTF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGH or UTF?

UTF has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to BGH (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGH dropped -48.73% vs UTF's -72.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.