PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGH vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGH vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGH achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than PDO's 0.55% return.


BGH

1D
0.78%
1M
0.93%
6M
-0.51%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
7.48%
ALL TIME*
6.30%

PDO

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.10M$1.19M$1.20M
$7.48M$6.95M$8.00M

BGH vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGH
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
0.49%8.56%27.22%18.18%-19.89%22.67%
PDO
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
0.55%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BGH and PDO is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.41

The correlation between BGH and PDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGH vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGH
BGH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGH vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGHPDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.15

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

0.65

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

2.11

-2.07

BGH vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGH and PDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGH vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGH drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGH and PDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGHPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-36.83%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-11.18%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-16.23%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-33.58%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-3.36%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-14.12%

+6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.74%

3.46%

+5.28%

Volatility

BGH vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) at 2.71%. This indicates that BGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGHPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.71%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

9.71%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

10.69%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

15.46%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

15.43%

+0.52%

Dividends

BGH vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

BGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.02%, more than PDO's 11.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGH
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
12.02%11.38%9.72%10.66%9.99%7.31%9.10%10.14%12.11%9.50%9.61%13.31%
PDO
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.79%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGH and PDO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGH has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to PDO (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGH dropped -48.73% vs PDO's -36.83%.

PDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGH and PDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer