PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGEIX vs. FGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGEIX achieves a -11.13% return, which is significantly lower than FGPMX's -9.99% return.


BGEIX

1D
3.47%
1M
-2.24%
6M
-19.57%
YTD
-11.13%
1Y
48.85%
3Y*
38.61%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
10.13%
ALL TIME*
5.11%

FGPMX

1D
3.28%
1M
-4.23%
6M
-18.67%
YTD
-9.99%
1Y
66.21%
3Y*
46.13%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGEIX
American Century Global Gold Fund
-11.13%158.45%15.10%7.52%-12.54%-8.85%18.92%37.82%-7.43%-1.57%
FGPMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6
-9.99%197.33%18.11%2.35%-23.15%-3.66%44.76%52.07%-17.76%-10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BGEIX and FGPMX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017

0.94

The correlation between BGEIX and FGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGEIX vs. FGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGEIX
BGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FGPMX
FGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGEIXFGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.79

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

4.00

-1.12

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the FGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGEIX and FGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGEIX drawdown since its inception was -78.69%, which is greater than FGPMX's maximum drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGEIX and FGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGEIXFGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.69%

-48.71%

-29.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.61%

-37.34%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.61%

-37.34%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.62%

-48.71%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.63%

-33.13%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

-18.11%

-17.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.45%

16.66%

+0.79%

Volatility

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) is 11.67%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that BGEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGEIXFGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

13.21%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.64%

38.55%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.61%

45.96%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.42%

34.64%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.49%

32.82%

+0.67%

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGEIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FGPMX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGEIX vs. FGPMX - Dividend Comparison

BGEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FGPMX's 10.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BGEIX
American Century Global Gold Fund
0.91%0.85%1.36%1.56%1.38%2.13%0.56%0.87%0.00%0.00%10.56%
FGPMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6
10.75%9.67%12.41%3.18%0.00%8.79%10.04%0.00%0.00%0.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BGEIX and FGPMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGPMX has higher volatility (13.21%) compared to BGEIX (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGEIX dropped -78.69% vs FGPMX's -48.71%.

FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGEIX and FGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer