BGDV vs. SPTM
BGDV (Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BGDV is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past year, BGDV returned 29.12% vs 34.97% for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
BGDV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGDV achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 3.56% return.
BGDV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 34.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
BGDV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 6.86% | 13.74% | -1.86% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 3.56% | 16.93% | -2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGDV and SPTM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between BGDV and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGDV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
BGDV
SPTM
BGDV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGDV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.70 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 3.74 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.66 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 16.70 | -2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGDV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.70 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.44 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
BGDV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGDV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGDV and SPTM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGDV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -54.80% | +40.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -8.68% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -9.09% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.91% | -0.03% |
Volatility
BGDV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) is 5.19%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that BGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGDV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 5.53% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 9.46% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 13.28% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 16.91% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 18.04% | -2.46% |
BGDV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGDV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
BGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPTM's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |