PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGCKX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGCKX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 6.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BGCKX having a 8.39% annualized return and VTMFX not far ahead at 8.70%.


BGCKX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.31%
YTD
12.50%
6M
15.65%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
8.39%

VTMFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGCKX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
12.50%18.38%21.55%14.60%1.80%3.42%0.33%-0.82%2.22%12.83%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
6.03%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BGCKX and VTMFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016

0.07

Over the past year, BGCKX and VTMFX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGCKX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGCKX
BGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGCKXVTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.55

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

3.22

+3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.51

15.40

+2.11

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGCKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGCKX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGCKXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

2.83

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.00

0.86

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.45

0.96

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.85

+0.54

Drawdowns

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGCKX drawdown since its inception was -9.47%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCKX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGCKXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-28.49%

+19.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-5.38%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.13%

-10.61%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.13%

-17.40%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.47%

-21.87%

+12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-3.55%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.12%

+0.13%

Volatility

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 1.70%. This indicates that BGCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGCKXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

1.70%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

4.75%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.85%

6.13%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

8.52%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

9.12%

-3.31%

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGCKX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGCKX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

BGCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than VTMFX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGCKX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
7.96%8.96%13.25%7.49%0.00%1.22%0.34%6.80%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.10%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGCKX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGCKX has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGCKX dropped -9.47% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

BGCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGCKX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer