BGB vs. PSHNX
BGB (Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund) and PSHNX (Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, BGB returned 4.83%/yr vs 4.83%/yr for PSHNX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGB charges 2.36%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for PSHNX.
Performance
BGB vs. PSHNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGB achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than PSHNX's 2.22% return.
BGB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- -0.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
PSHNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.83%
- 10Y*
- —
BGB vs. PSHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | -0.64% | 4.80% | 18.69% | 19.50% | -16.06% | 15.41% | -4.69% | 17.07% | -5.21% | 1.71% |
PSHNX Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 2.22% | 7.72% | 7.19% | 8.72% | -2.26% | 3.43% | 0.88% | 7.40% | 0.61% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGB and PSHNX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGB vs. PSHNX — Risk / Return Rank
BGB
PSHNX
BGB vs. PSHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (PSHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGB | PSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.78 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 5.16 | -5.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 26.42 | -26.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGB vs. PSHNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGB drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, which is greater than PSHNX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGB and PSHNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGB | PSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.87% | -14.53% | -30.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | -1.14% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -2.83% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -6.02% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | 0.00% | -4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -0.87% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 0.22% | +4.36% |
Volatility
BGB vs. PSHNX - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (PSHNX) at 0.23%. This indicates that BGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGB | PSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 0.23% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.39% | 1.47% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.53% | 1.86% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 2.65% | +8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 3.14% | +12.93% |
BGB vs. PSHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGB has a 2.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PSHNX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGB vs. PSHNX - Dividend Comparison
BGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than PSHNX's 6.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | 8.45% | 8.58% | 9.26% | 10.69% | 7.35% | 6.63% | 8.77% | 9.30% | 11.18% | 7.35% | 8.76% | 9.42% |
PSHNX Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 6.06% | 6.27% | 6.43% | 4.95% | 3.47% | 3.17% | 3.95% | 3.65% | 3.13% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGB and PSHNX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGB has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to PSHNX (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGB dropped -44.87% vs PSHNX's -14.53%.
PSHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGB and PSHNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer