BGB vs. BSL
Compare and contrast key facts about Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL).
BGB is an actively managed fund by Blackstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2012. BSL is an actively managed fund by Blackstone. It was launched on May 26, 2010.
Performance
BGB vs. BSL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGB vs. BSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | -4.05% | 4.80% | 18.69% | 19.50% | -16.06% | 15.41% | -4.69% | 17.07% | -5.21% | 10.09% |
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund | -2.74% | 2.15% | 18.16% | 20.03% | -22.88% | 28.33% | -4.44% | 14.06% | -7.52% | 5.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGB achieves a -4.05% return, which is significantly lower than BSL's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BGB has outperformed BSL with an annualized return of 6.93%, while BSL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.35% annualized return.
BGB
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -4.65%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
BSL
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- -0.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGB vs. BSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGB has a 2.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BSL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGB vs. BSL — Risk / Return Rank
BGB
BSL
BGB vs. BSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGB | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | -0.08 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.12 | -0.06 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.99 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | -0.15 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | -0.42 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGB | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | -0.08 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.43 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.39 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.31 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGB and BSL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGB vs. BSL - Dividend Comparison
BGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than BSL's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | 8.87% | 8.58% | 9.26% | 10.69% | 7.35% | 6.63% | 8.77% | 9.30% | 11.18% | 7.35% | 8.76% | 9.42% |
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund | 8.61% | 8.45% | 9.46% | 10.76% | 6.89% | 5.75% | 7.65% | 8.15% | 9.21% | 5.93% | 5.86% | 7.27% |
Drawdowns
BGB vs. BSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGB drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, roughly equal to the maximum BSL drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGB and BSL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGB | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.87% | -43.83% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.03% | -7.86% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -24.48% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.87% | -43.83% | -1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -5.13% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -7.40% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.79% | +1.11% |
Volatility
BGB vs. BSL - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) at 2.59%. This indicates that BGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGB | BSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 2.59% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | 4.83% | +1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 8.00% | +4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 11.08% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 16.42% | -0.28% |