BGB vs. BGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX).
BGB is an actively managed fund by Blackstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2012. BGX is an actively managed fund by Blackstone. It was launched on Jan 27, 2011.
Performance
BGB vs. BGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGB vs. BGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | -4.40% | 4.80% | 18.69% | 19.50% | -16.06% | 15.41% | -4.69% | 17.07% | -5.21% | 10.09% |
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | -6.43% | 2.09% | 19.83% | 18.92% | -20.57% | 17.54% | -5.67% | 24.98% | -4.19% | 7.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGB achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly higher than BGX's -6.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BGB having a 6.93% annualized return and BGX not far ahead at 7.03%.
BGB
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -4.91%
- 1Y
- 0.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
BGX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- -4.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGB vs. BGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGB has a 2.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BGX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGB vs. BGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGB
BGX
BGB vs. BGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGB | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | -0.37 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | -0.42 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.93 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.38 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | -0.95 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGB | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | -0.37 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGB and BGX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGB vs. BGX - Dividend Comparison
BGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, less than BGX's 9.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | 8.90% | 8.58% | 9.26% | 10.69% | 7.35% | 6.63% | 8.77% | 9.30% | 11.18% | 7.35% | 8.76% | 9.42% |
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund | 9.42% | 8.87% | 9.89% | 11.71% | 8.15% | 7.01% | 8.76% | 9.35% | 11.74% | 7.12% | 9.01% | 8.72% |
Drawdowns
BGB vs. BGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGB drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, smaller than the maximum BGX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGB and BGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGB | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.87% | -47.40% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | -12.43% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -25.94% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.87% | -47.40% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -10.01% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -6.98% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 5.04% | -1.10% |
Volatility
BGB vs. BGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) is 3.82%, while Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that BGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGB | BGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 4.22% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 6.53% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 13.50% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 11.80% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 17.55% | -1.41% |