PSHNX vs. RSIIX
PSHNX (Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund) and RSIIX (RiverPark Strategic Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PSHNX returned 4.81%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for RSIIX. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PSHNX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for RSIIX.
Performance
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSHNX achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than RSIIX's 2.32% return.
PSHNX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.98%
RSIIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSHNX Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 2.16% | 7.72% | 7.19% | 8.72% | -2.26% | 3.43% | 0.88% | 7.40% | 0.61% | 0.65% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 2.32% | 6.04% | 8.44% | 9.59% | -3.31% | 11.60% | 3.42% | 3.50% | 1.36% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSHNX and RSIIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSHNX vs. RSIIX — Risk / Return Rank
PSHNX
RSIIX
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (PSHNX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSHNX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.39 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 2.35 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.06 | 15.46 | +8.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSHNX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum RSIIX drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSHNX and RSIIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSHNX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -15.55% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.14% | -1.79% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.83% | -1.79% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.02% | -5.61% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.21% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -1.15% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.27% | -0.05% |
Volatility
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (PSHNX) is 0.42%, while RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that PSHNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSHNX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.56% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 2.89% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 3.12% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 2.51% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 2.88% | +0.25% |
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSHNX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than RSIIX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSHNX vs. RSIIX - Dividend Comparison
PSHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than RSIIX's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSHNX Penn Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.97% | 6.27% | 6.43% | 4.95% | 3.47% | 3.17% | 3.95% | 3.65% | 3.13% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 6.63% | 7.75% | 7.67% | 7.61% | 6.58% | 5.12% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 4.59% | 4.98% | 5.10% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSHNX and RSIIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSIIX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to PSHNX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSHNX dropped -14.53% vs RSIIX's -15.55%.
PSHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSHNX and RSIIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer