BFRZ vs. UXJL
BFRZ (Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFRZ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFRZ achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
BFRZ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFRZ Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF | 1.49% | 4.82% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFRZ and UXJL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFRZ vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
BFRZ
UXJL
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFRZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFRZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.75 | 1.87 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRZ and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFRZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -10.29% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.76% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -1.51% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFRZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 13.90% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 13.90% | -9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 13.90% | -9.02% |
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFRZ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFRZ vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
BFRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFRZ Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF | 0.26% | 0.20% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFRZ and UXJL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BFRZ.
BFRZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BFRZ and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for BFRZ and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer