PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFRZ vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFRZ achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.42% return.


BFRZ

1D
0.05%
1M
3.03%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.03%
1Y
8.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFRZ and BUFF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.61

The correlation between BFRZ and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFRZ vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFRZ
BFRZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BFRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BFRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFRZBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.80

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

4.24

-1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.58

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.02

-1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

21.50

-13.55

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFRZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFRZ and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFRZBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.80

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

0.49

+1.36

Drawdowns

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRZ and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFRZBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-46.23%

+43.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-3.58%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-6.18%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.67%

+0.43%

Volatility

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFRZBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.02%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.70%

3.83%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

5.15%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

8.41%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.87%

17.67%

-12.80%

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BFRZ and BUFF have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

BFRZ vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

BFRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while BUFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BFRZ
Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF
0.25%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFRZ and BUFF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFRZ has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFRZ dropped -3.12% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 1-year performance, BUFF leads with 14.36% vs 8.65% for BFRZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 14.36% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BFRZ and BUFF have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

BFRZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFRZ and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer