PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOC vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOC vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOC vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and UXJL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOC vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFOC vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFOCUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.88

1.87

-3.75

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-10.29%

-7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-0.76%

-17.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-1.51%

-11.01%

Volatility

BFOC vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

13.90%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

13.90%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

13.90%

-1.29%

BFOC vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOC vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFOC nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BFOC and UXJL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

BFOC and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOC and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer