BFOC vs. GRID
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. BFOC is actively managed, while GRID is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
BFOC vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
BFOC vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 28.91% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and GRID is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
GRID
BFOC vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFOC | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.88 | 0.57 | -2.45 |
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -40.56% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.20% | -1.33% | -16.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.52% | -8.43% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 19.39% | -6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 21.00% | -8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 22.81% | -10.20% |
BFOC vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and GRID have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.70% for GRID.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer