PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFMCX vs. WFBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFMCX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than WFBIX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMCX has underperformed WFBIX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while WFBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.96% annualized return.


BFMCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
1.56%

WFBIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
0.31%7.43%0.66%5.32%-14.35%-1.52%8.32%9.85%-0.28%3.16%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.43%7.16%1.43%9.65%-13.03%-1.79%7.40%8.72%-0.08%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BFMCX and WFBIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 1993

0.89

The correlation between BFMCX and WFBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFMCX vs. WFBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFMCX
BFMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BFMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BFMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

WFBIX
WFBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
WFBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WFBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFMCXWFBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.26

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.89

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.85

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

5.57

-0.36

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the WFBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFMCX and WFBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFMCXWFBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.26

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.15

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.38

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.94

-0.07

Drawdowns

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, roughly equal to the maximum WFBIX drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and WFBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFMCXWFBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-18.68%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-3.02%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.76%

-6.09%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

-17.84%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.49%

-18.68%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.50%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-2.26%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.00%

+0.10%

Volatility

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that BFMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFMCXWFBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

2.84%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.98%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.14%

6.40%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

5.17%

-0.12%

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than WFBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFMCX vs. WFBIX - Dividend Comparison

BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than WFBIX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
4.36%4.10%3.86%3.21%1.86%2.11%5.78%2.86%3.02%2.69%2.41%2.57%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
3.91%3.78%3.68%6.82%2.60%2.04%2.43%2.88%2.71%2.24%2.25%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BFMCX and WFBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BFMCX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to WFBIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMCX dropped -19.49% vs WFBIX's -18.68%.

BFMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFMCX and WFBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer