BFMCX vs. FFANX
BFMCX (BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both mutual funds - BFMCX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by BlackRock, while FFANX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, BFMCX returned 1.54%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for FFANX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFMCX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.
Performance
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFMCX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMCX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 1.54%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.
BFMCX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
FFANX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 0.31% | 7.43% | 0.66% | 5.32% | -14.35% | -1.52% | 8.32% | 9.85% | -0.28% | 3.16% |
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund | 7.59% | 13.16% | 7.40% | 11.52% | -13.62% | 8.03% | 13.10% | 15.81% | -4.06% | 11.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFMCX and FFANX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, BFMCX and FFANX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFMCX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank
BFMCX
FFANX
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFMCX | FFANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.27 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 13.93 | -9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and FFANX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFMCX | FFANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -31.69% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -5.20% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.76% | -7.55% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -18.52% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.49% | -18.52% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | 0.00% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -3.79% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.22% | -0.05% |
Volatility
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) is 1.16%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that BFMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFMCX | FFANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 3.02% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 6.03% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 7.07% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 7.94% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 7.74% | -2.68% |
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFMCX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison
BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 4.36% | 4.10% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 5.78% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 2.69% | 2.41% | 2.57% |
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund | 3.65% | 3.97% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 5.75% | 2.35% | 2.36% | 3.67% | 4.56% | 2.56% | 1.43% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFMCX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFANX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to BFMCX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMCX dropped -19.49% vs FFANX's -31.69%.
FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFMCX and FFANX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer