PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFLB vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFLB vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFLB achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.81% return.


BFLB

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.53%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.21%
YTD
10.81%
6M
11.74%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLB vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFLB and BAPR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFLB vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLB

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLB vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFLB vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFLBBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

0.84

+0.87

Drawdowns

BFLB vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLB drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLB and BAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFLBBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-23.91%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.23%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-2.59%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

BFLB vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFLBBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

5.64%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.76%

11.49%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

13.12%

-5.36%

BFLB vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BFLB and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BFLB vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFLB nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BFLB and BAPR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFLB and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

BFLB and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: BufferLABS and Innovator.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFLB and BAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer