BFJL vs. GRID
BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
BFJL vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.40% return.
BFJL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -4.46%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 23.40%
- 6M
- 22.11%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.63%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
BFJL vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -7.59% | -7.43% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.40% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFJL and GRID is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFJL vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
BFJL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GRID
BFJL vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFJL | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFJL vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFJL | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -40.56% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.12% | -5.55% | -15.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -8.42% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.29% | — |
Volatility
BFJL vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFJL | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 21.26% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 21.37% | -8.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 22.80% | -9.43% |
BFJL vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFJL vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.46% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFJL and GRID have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.
BFJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.70% for GRID.
Find the right allocation for BFJL and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer